Sunday 9 April 2017

heart-breaking news: tony blasé still not expelled from british labour party



following an official disciplinary hearing - repeatedly and indefinitely postponed since the outset of the illegal iraq war - it has tonight been announced, by a spoke in the never-ending neo-conservative weal of socialist dialectical manipulation, that, despite the quite distinct electoral advantage which would inevitably be accrued thereby, former prime-minister tony blasé will, as-it-happens, not be thrown smirk-face-first out of the labour party, and nor will he be hung out to dry on the psycho's picket-line as a pithy poetic prelude to having his bollocks painfully employed for the purposes of playing cross-parliamentary ping-pong competitions.

indeed, according to a pretty correct and well-formed source of conventional wisdom within corbyn komsomol pressure-group more-mental, editors at spark up! further understand the extra-double-dextra-fundamental left-wing ideological position to be thus:

"whilst all true socialists appreciate that blasé is a serial wog-bombing bastard, who has assisted in the commission of a truly sick spectrum of ultra-heinous crimes against humanity, ranging from the culpable genocide of arabs in iraq, and of asians in afghanistan, right through to chronic, cruel and calculated nitrogen dioxide gas-attacks unleashed against his own british people - which were allegedly effected by employing dodgy diesel-powered wagons-of-mass-destruction as a preferred delivery system - we, as loyal labour members, none-the-less accept it to be firmly established labour party policy to ensure that former oil-primed minister mr blasé and his criminal neo-conservative accomplices never be brought to face justice of any form before any british court of law...
and, in light of this socially unconscious collective decision, we, as labour members, equally accept therefore that the british people will never again elect our nasty little neo-liberally corrupted party-on-a-cia-string to government...
we, as loyal members, instead envisaging labour purely as a pathetic party of professional perennial opposition.
wossat...?
err...so according to information provided by un petit chardonneret perched strategically upon the global gravy-strained grapevine of gratuitous gossip, tony and charming wife cheroot have, in addition to these afore-listed social misdemeanors, been busy co-ordinating with bomb-barmy buddies billy and hilly klondyke, the pentagon, mi6, as well as the royal families of quasar and swordy arabia, in an evil orchestrated effort to facilitate the clandestine arming of so-called islamic state also known as al qaeda also known as the cia...?
oh well, no-one's perfect, eh?"

11 comments:

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part one said...

now, there's never been any real cloak of secrecy surrounding team-trump's rabid desire to investigate the clinton-gang's international war-crimes...

and given that united states intelligence agents, loyal to the prodigal president, have, from the moment of his illustrious inauguration, been heavily engaged in prizing open industrial-sized cans of corruption-gorged worms - hitherto stored securely away in deep-basement washington-closets - it seems therefore extremely improbable that the blairs' super-shoddy dealings in the middle-east will, for very much longer, remain comfortably snug in the insalubrious shade of the indecently oil-rich oasis of opulent oppression.

trump launched this deep-state probe when, under the pretext of holding inteviews for the position of secretary-of-state, he actually set about grilling neo-con establishment messieurs petraeus and romney like a prize-pair of inadvertantly trapped turncoat-turkeys, before rigorously pumping these poor cartelized cogs-without-a-conscious for all the inside information they possessed - especially deep ingrained dirt on the international clinton crime-syndicate.

however, as the united kingdom's home secretary, why did current british prime minister theresa may not launch an enquiry into the blairs' illicit dealings with the clintons, and with the royal families of qatar and saudi arabia, in order to establish the full extent to which the blairs' corrupt relationships with these globally powerful dynasties has subsequently promoted the cataclysmic arming and financing of al qaeda terror groups such as the islamic state?


the daily mail:

why was cherie so keen to open doors for a billionaire sheikh's wife?


the guardian:

hillary clinton lobbied by cherie blair to meet qatari royal, emails reveal


the guardian:

hillary clinton emails: cherie blair lobbied for qatari crown prince


the observer:

sheikha mozah: the (un)acceptable face of qatar’s global expansion


21st century wire:

arms to al-qaeda: u.s. generals admit washington has backed islamic militants in syria


levant report:

defense intelligence agency document: west will facilitate rise of islamic state “in order to isolate the syrian regime”


counterpunch:

how the west created the islamic state

countess crack-tongue the third said...

@a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part one

a cunt, a cunt, my kingdom for a cunt...

uuuuuuuuuuuaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarghschplop

madame hotte croûton said...

@countess crack-tongue the third

give the delusional old drama-queen a fiver for her next funny-fag-fix and tell her to fuck-off back into seventies surrealist cinema...

and you know what...?

without-a-word-of-a-lie...

i even hear the little social-climbing cow's after me old part now...

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part two said...

of course, although the new white house administration's specially convened bog-busting police-squad has in prospect the huge job of unravelling the wicked worldwide web of dodgy covert political plumbing - so subversively installed by the office's previous incumbents...

and although there is a wealth of potential war-crime-financing to unearth from the turgid history of highly suspect links between the blairs, the clintons, the saudi and qatari royal families, and clinton's former aide, huma abedin...

one is nevertheless forced to concede that trump's shit-panners-and-sifters should immediately devote substantial resources to a thorough investigation of the key rôle played by british security outfit 'blue mountain' group in directly facilitating the assassination of the united states ambassador to libya, chris stevens.

blue mountain security solutions limited, previously known as 'pilgrim elite', was originally associated with the 'eclipse' group in the united states - a private intelligence agency run by former senior cia operations officer duane "dewy" clarridge, who had a history of deep-involvement in a long string of illicit cia activities, including the notorious 1980s iran-contra scandal.

here set out are the fundamental questions which must now be asked about theresa may's wilful and criminal erosion of the united kingdom's national security:


as home secretary, why did theresa may not launch an official enquiry into the libyan-focused activities of blue mountain group - the british-based cia-mi6-al qaeda-connected security company, which, having dubiously won the contract to protect the united states consulate compound in libya, then disastrously proceeded to employ unarmed al qaeda-affiliated guards, before ultimately instructing its contract-manager in benghazi to fly out of the city just hours before the assassination-attack was launched?


the telegraph:

british firm secured benghazi consulate contract with little experience


wikipedia:

eclipse group


wikipedia:

duane clarridge


fox news:

benghazi guards turned on us diplomats in 2012 attack, sources say


washington examiner:

benghazi security contractor had history of failure in libya, emails show


reuters:

for benghazi diplomatic security, u.s. relied on small british firm


the atlantic:

the welsh security contractor behind america's benghazi consulate guards


diplopundit:

tag archives: blue mountain: #benghazi news: what did the arb and benghazi committee know about alamir, eclipse and xpand?

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part three said...

as home secretary, why did theresa may not oppose the recruitment by our intelligence services, mi5 and mi6, of jihadists to fight against president gaddafi in libya, and against president assad in syria?


21st century wire:

arms to al-qaeda: u.s. generals admit washington has backed islamic militants in syria


global research:

u.s. efforts to arm jihadis in syria: the scandal behind the benghazi undercover cia facility


business insider uk:

how us ambassador chris stevens may have been linked to jihadist rebels in syria

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part four said...

who controls the united kingdom's intelligence and security services: mrs dismay, the cia, saudi arabia, or al qaeda?

why, during a general election campaign, has prime minister theresa may gagged the mainstream british media and officially prohibited it from reporting any further details of a security tip-off from the united states federal bureau of investigation, back in january 2017, which forewarned the united kingdom's mi5 intelligence service of salman abedi's intention to commit an act of terrorism on british soil?

why, during a general election campaign, has prime minister theresa may gagged the mainstream british media and officially prohibited it from any further reporting of details concerning the allegedly year-old fbi investigation into salman abedi's terrorist activities?

was theresa may still in post as united kingdom home secretary when, back in mid-2016, in conjunction with the british mi5 intelligence service, the fbi initially launched its investigation into salman abedi's terrorist activities?



truepublica:

truth revealed: british intelligence received warnings of manchester bomber attack


the daily mail:

fbi 'warned mi5 in january that the manchester bomber was planning an attack on britain'


world socialist web site:

british intelligence received warnings that manchester bomber was plotting attacks

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part five said...

as prime minister, why has theresa may continued to protect libyan jihadists who, whilst she held the position of home secretary, had with impunity been permitted to form an islamic state terror-cell in manchester?


aljazeera:

libya and the manchester connection

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part six said...

as home secretary in the previous conservative government, why did theresa may conspire with the united states administration in the creation, financing, and arming of the islamic state, and in the deliberate recruitment of its jihadists?


the daily mail:

peter oborne: why mi6 must share the blame for the jihadis in our midst


levant report:

defense intelligence agency document: west will facilitate rise of islamic state “in order to isolate the syrian regime”


counterpunch:

how the west created the islamic state

a mere detail in the idyllic garden of democracy - part seven said...

as home secretary, why did theresa may not launch an enquiry into the blairs' illicit interactions with the clintons, and the royal families of qatar and saudi arabia, and into the extent to which these dealings have promoted the arming and financing of al qaeda terror groups such as the islamic state?


the daily mail:

why was cherie so keen to open doors for a billionaire sheikh's wife?


the guardian:

hillary clinton lobbied by cherie blair to meet qatari royal, emails reveal


the guardian:

hillary clinton emails: cherie blair lobbied for qatari crown prince


the observer:

sheikha mozah: the (un)acceptable face of qatar’s global expansion


21st century wire:

arms to al-qaeda: u.s. generals admit washington has backed islamic militants in syria


levant report:

defense intelligence agency document: west will facilitate rise of islamic state “in order to isolate the syrian regime”


counterpunch:

how the west created the islamic state

islamic extremism and christian extremism: birds of a feather dance like completely over-pampered fucking prats together said...

there are so many civilians being killed by united states and allied western air-strikes in syria, iraq, afghanistan, yemen, and somalia that one must truly believe hillary clinton and obama still to be running the middle-east's slaughter-show from the theatre-wings...

is donald trump a real president with an independent mind, or is he just another cheap office-lackey of the washington neo-conservative élite?

gary johnson would have made a much better leader of the free world, because he knew instinctively that america could only improve world-stability by getting out of all the evil, greedy, unchristian oil-wars it has sought to wage against the civilian populations of africa, asia and the middle-east...

...and then staying out.

why is trump selling such a crazy cache of arms to the saudis, does he support islamic extremism?

or is he just some warped form of christian extremist who would load a gun and invite his neighbour to hold it to his head?

mr trump should listen to his true supporters, who are ashamed of america's immoral wars against liberty, free-trade and human decency.

he shouldn't get embroiled in endless wars of socio-racial-suppression simply to service and satisfy the perversely pathetic needs of his own psychological insecurities.

he should:

get out and stay out...

...otherwise he will just become obama without a sun-tan.

puja said...

Very interesting and informative post, special thanks for the links,
I hope that your article will be helpful. CSUF Portal Information